Government alleges
The FTC and 22 states say Amazon used undisclosed soft reserves to raise Sponsored Ads prices above a competition-generated result.
A transparent process for separating allegations, party responses, court decisions, and unresolved questions.
Last reviewed: September 2, 2026
The FTC and 22 states say Amazon used undisclosed soft reserves to raise Sponsored Ads prices above a competition-generated result.
Amazon says relevance drives ad placement, reserve prices are common, bids are maximum CPCs, and advertisers were neither deceived nor harmed.
No court has ruled on liability, advertiser damages, restitution, a settlement, or eligibility for recovery.
Source cards distinguish primary sources from reporting and commentary. A public-source docket review is not described as a complete official docket review. Redacted or unavailable information is labeled unresolved rather than reconstructed.
Consequential factual statements are linked to the most direct available source. Pleading allegations use language such as “the complaint alleges.” Amazon's positions use “Amazon says.” Only entered decisions are described as court rulings. Statistics and damage estimates remain attributed to the party presenting them.
Settlement, refund, claim-form, class-action, assigned-judge, and procedural-status statements carry an as-of date. Before a material update, we check current court records and official party sources. The visible site-wide verification timestamp comes from one structured case-status record.
Readers can submit a correction, missing primary source, or attribution concern through the contact page. Please include the page URL, disputed text, and the strongest available source. Submissions do not create an attorney-client relationship.